The law will make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to prevent children younger than 16 from holding accounts.

  • Quokka@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Really interested to know how this is going to work with say running a Lemmy instance.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Meet me at the bar for drinks, at the government licensed dispensary for controlled substances, or at the club for a good time… for age-verification purposes, obviously.

  • Twoafros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This seems like a good thing. To repeat what someone on here said, even if its not fully enforceable by the companies, it will be good way for parents to prevent their kids from being hooked on socials at a young age

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Can you please send a picture of your ID to lemmy.world admins so that we can make sure you are not a 15 years old australian kid?

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Platforms would not be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued identity documents including passports or driver’s licenses, nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

        So no, ain’t gonna happen.

          • .Donuts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Wouldn’t this:

            nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

            Prevent that from being possible? I realize you’re sarcastically describing a dystopian solution but the law seems to be pretty clear in terms of how government ID can’t be used.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The platforms have one year to work out how they could implement the ban before penalties are enforced. … Platforms would not be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued identity documents including passports or driver’s licenses, nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

      Magic apparently, they just passed the law without providing any solution.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        nor could they demand digital identification through a government system

        That makes no sense at all. It’s the only sane option: “hey, user xyz here wants to use our website, please tell us if they’re allowed to” and leave it up to the government, who has all the data, to answer that. What else can they provide? A blood sample to determine “biological age” or something?

      • VodkaSolution
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They could try and fail, then appeal the law, or they can appeal the law before trying and failing. If it was, let’s say Italy, it would be normal: an unforceable law nobody cares about, unless a couple of times per year with big fines and media coverage