Congratulations and thank you from simple user! Have fun in your new positions!

does it shoot with a gun?

beautiful fireworks 🎇🤩

More detailed information from a classical newspaper, in German language: https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/bayern/abhaengigkeit-von-usa-bayern-will-keine-microsoft-lizenzen-1-114314412

Thank you! I will ask here. Before asking, though, I will study Github and https://matrix.org/docs/chat_basics/matrix-for-im/ more in detail.

I was in #matrix:matrix.org this afternoon. Very much meaningless chatter. Serious questions (before today) kind of disappear in a stream of chatter and intermingling dialogues. I personally prefer a more structured place, like Lemmy offers technically. Good that some people crated and run this community here.

Great! I wonder one thing: How can UA destroy so many expensive AD systems with drones? Shouldn’t those systems right those weapons?

Sounds great. Is it better (cheaper, easier to produce) than IRIS-T SLM?

Not good. might help Orban in election. And UA clearly must not conduct crimes in EU, not even in Hungary.

Hopefully right.

The usually very accurate, not overly optimistic oder pessimistic German ex nato general Bühler says, in contrary, the whole area Pokrovsk is ‘not usable’ any more for UA army.

citation from episode summary: In den Regionen Saporischschja und Dnipropetrowsk habe die Ukraine taktische Angriffe gestartet, womit aber nur das langsame Vorrücken der Russen gestoppt worden sei. Russland dagegen hat dagegen die Stadt Konstantinowka weigehend eingenommen und auch der gesamte Raum Pokrowsk und Myrnohrad sei für die ukrainische Armee nicht mehr nutzbar. Das monatelange Gefecht werde langsam zu Ende gehen.

[Was tun, Herr General? - Der Podcast zum Ukraine-Krieg] #314 Die militärische Lage nach vier Jahren Krieg #wasTunHerrGeneralDerPodcastZumUkraineKrieg https://podcastaddict.com/was-tun-herr-general-der-podcast-zum-ukraine-krieg/episode/217969810 via @PodcastAddict

deleted by creator

I hope very much you are right!

I cannot find the information in the ISW report (unfortunately) that could be interpreted in a way as the comment of the OP seems to do.

So important. But who was against a bolder agreement, with default EU (or open source, I hope) and option to opt out for special reasons, and why?

In terms of content, the report focuses on a strategic reorientation of public procurement and infrastructure. The compromise line adopted stipulates that member states can favor European tech providers in strategic sectors to systematically strengthen the technological capacity of the Community. The Greens even called for a stricter regulation here, where the use of products “Made in EU” should become the rule and exceptions would have to be explicitly justified. They also pushed for a definition for cloud infrastructure that provides for full EU jurisdiction without dependencies on third countries.

I wish my countries (CH, DE) were equally committed! Such an important assistance now!