There was a blind taste test where the instant coffee won.

I guess it also depends on how well it was brewed in the first place. If you start with a really coffee before you evaporate it it’s going to be good instant coffee too.

I don’t actually mind an instant coffee. The taste is very consistent while regular coffee can easily get horrendous.

It’s quite easy actually. You just need to spend 90% of your day watching TikTok. /s

Seriously though what do you mean by this? Most young people ‘tech trends’ are just capitalism fucking them over, the screen time of gen z and gen A is insane. There is nothing interesting going on there, all the cool stuff is here on lemmy: Linux, open source, AI without the billionaire hype etc.

I’m a member of the younger generation myself and I don’t understand why people so many people don’t see it as a leach on their lives, maybe it’s my neurodivergence that makes me have a different perspective.

Just someone who is against communism. I did not intend to make it seam you hated us.

my bad, i’ll fix it

I even fixed the spelling!

*weakest

They support genocide so it’s more like the left wing branch of fascism.

It’s just a man with long hair and wider than average hips.

This is awesome, thanks!

Thanks that does alleviate my concerns, I do like the name Plutonium or Plutonium-os.

This is very cool! I like the idea of atomic distros although I haven’t really gotten into them much, if you keep on working on this project I might join it.

Question: I’m a bit confused about the package management system you talked about. Flatpaks for user level packages? What about the official arch repo and the AUR? I know other atomic distro’s don’t really work with traditional package managers, what does this mean for Pu-239? If there’s no AUR then there is no Arch Linux at least for me.

Also that name could probably do with some work lol. Maybe work on a shorthand way of spelling it and a better way to pronounce it? I’m not sure.

This is why we should call it “bleeding edge” rather than “unstable” it’s a much more accurate name and it exemplifies the advantages (albeit leaving out the (minor) disadvantages)

Interesting, I will look into that although it does contradict my view that oil companies have control over the US government rather than the other way around.

I don’t understand the wording of that sentence.

They don’t have to extract the oil if they don’t want to, but clearly it’s profitable for them because they are extracting oil.

The coups don’t cost them any money, it’s the tax payers that pay for that.

That is indeed the Wikipedia article I included in my comment. (after editing it)

Writes an entire essay to state a simple point. Why didn’t they reply? My argument was so interesting!

I’m pretty sure big oil wants more oil. If govenment stops letting them take the oil they will just coup them again. Why does big oil not want this?