unknownuserunknownlocation

  • 7 Posts
  • 654 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 1st, 2025

help-circle








  • It’s wrong because it’s simply irrelevant. Would it change anything about your situation if you did have it worse than everyone else (other than not getting comments like this)? I presume not. You’re still suffering, full stop, and that’s something that should be alleviated.

    There will always be someone who has it worse. So the war casualties in Iran allegedly have it worse. First off, do they really? Some might argue that prolonged suffering is worse than a sudden death via a missile. But even without that opinion, there are people who have it worse than the Iran war casualties. You could be stuck in North Korea sentenced to a lifetime of hard labor and have terrible back pain making every hour of that hard labor torture. Does that mean the casualties of the war in Iran aren’t relevant anymore? I’m pretty sure just about everyone would answer no.




  • Fully agree that poverty plays a significant role in loneliness, or at least, the analysis adds up in my view. I’ve also found that in many cases where some other societal denominator is mentioned as a reason for people being worse off, poverty plays a significant, often more significant, factor.

    What worries me is what is addressed in the first few paragraphs - the way the male loneliness epidemic, real or not, is talked about in an almost mocking tone, and that just being accepted by society at large as normal. I also know that men are much more likely to die by suicide, and the supposed male loneliness epidemic has often been brought into connection with that. If it’s not that, what is it? I mean, I have my guesses, but that’s another story. I just wish the author would have looked at that angle a little closer, because I feel there’s a significant piece of the puzzle missing there somewhere.