• ZeroCool@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yep, this news actually broke a couple days ago, I remember seeing a Brave fanboy having a meltdown over it and ranting about how Mozilla is the real shady company, blah, blah, blah.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          To be fair. Mozilla foundation is shady. They keep pushing things that don’t follow their core mission. That try to expand their brand.

          You can use Mozilla to build solid privacy respecting systems, but Firefox out of the box not so much. They’re better than Google, but that’s a low fucking bar.

          Mullvad browser, Tor browser, mull for Android - all use the core Firefox open source engine, to make privacy respecting programs that work out of the box with privacy respecting defaults.

          So I would say Mozilla is a good guy in this conversation, but not a saint.

          • no banana @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            56
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I’m not a fan of it either, but it’s not too shady when they’re open about it IMO.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Fair enough, they aren’t evil to be sure.

              The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don’t trust them because of that… Shady good guy vibes:)

              • no banana @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                27
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                They’re doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It’s not great, but it’s not like they’re installing malware in the background.

                • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn’t worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today’s day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google’s PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it.

                  • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding.

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/

                  They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don’t install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don’t trust them anymore.

                  I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it’s impossible with them. So I don’t. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That’s what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web

                  • ΛdΛm_𝒷@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    The blog post is pretty recent but the version he’s talking about is 57 ! I’m confused, is this the ESR version ?

              • Clegko@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla’s purchase of them has made them better if anything.

                • no banana @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’ve always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I’m a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all).

                  • Clegko@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can’t live without it.

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            They keep trying to make money so they don’t go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The problem is Mozilla advertises themselves as this last bastion of privacy but a cursory glance at their own privacy policy makes it very clear that they’re blowing smoke up your ass.

            Yes, you can change some settings and add extensions to make it private but out of the box it is anything but.

            The sad truth is that, despite being a basic necessity, there are no “good” browsers. It’s very difficult to have a monetization model that is privacy-respecting.

            Yes you can use something like Mullvad that is totally privacy-respecting out of the box, but it’s so far down the scale that it will break a lot of sites.

            Brave is just the flavor of shit that I choose to eat.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Fair enough. I’m glad it works for you.

              For what it’s worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven’t found anything it doesn’t work for.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                It’s mainly NoScript that breaks sites for me, and there’s no way to disable it.

                Actually currently my Mullvad browser is not working at all. I have no idea why. My other 4 browsers continue unfettered but Mullvad won’t load a single webpage.

                Plus not being unable to be set as the the default browser means I often forget it’s even there.

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally.

                  Sorry to hear mullvad’s not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug

                  Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It’s a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser

          • russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah if it’s the comment chain that I think they’re referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla “being in bed with Google” because Google is the default search engine.

            I’ll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I’m crazy for taking that position.

            • clearleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users.

      • kirk781@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I follow Ghacks, a tech site, as well and boy there is a Brave shill on there who attacks everyone there for daring to say anything against it. He knows stuff, judging from his comments, yet is so anti Mozilla and pro Brave that I can’t understand. Almost thinks anyone not using Brave is inferior.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s not good to stereotype people. But, I would bet money that they have any three of these: bought NFCs NFTs unironically, supports OpenAI unconditionally, propose blockchain on everything, bought a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would be millions of dollars today and are still salty about it, have a Starlink receiver, drive a beaten down Tesla they can’t afford to repair because they spent their money paying for FSD early access, and would definitely be first in line to fly Starship to Mars if they were allowed to, they posts to imageai regularly.

          EDIT: autocorrect.

          • kirk781@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        don’t you just love projection?

        cant accept the facts, so deflect the criticism to something else that is in no way a valid target for them.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        The Mozilla foundation is super shady, and some Firefox devs does have it in them to change stuff to piss off people. It doesn’t excuse Brave though.

          • cley_faye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Their public reports were a fair share of the money goes to its administration, were the dev funds are lower each years, were some funded orgs does not seem to exist, with the addition of actual user contribution being a drop in the ocean of money influx, is the source for the “shady” part.

            Me (and many other) having long debates on their bugzilla about changes they made that ignore user settings, against all common practices, with no chance of reverting them because they knew better, until some big service (say, gmail) is impacted at which point all their arguments are forgotten and the changes are reverted, for the pissing of people part.

    • sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve actually been attacked on several occasions by brave fan boys when I casually mentioned that I switched to Firefox and loved it. Idk what their deal is but I find it hilarious that all this stuff is coming out about brave recently 🤣