Finally, we can have usernames in Signal instead of giving our phone number to everybody.

  • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You’re referring to anonymity, not privacy.

    Matrix/Element is slower than shit. I don’t understand why anyone recommends this.

    Session is also slow but that’s not even a problem because I don’t know anyone who’s even heard of it, much less used it, and that’s mostly because it doesn’t have phone numbers.

    At least some people I know are on Signal and I can easily discover them by phone #. Or at least I used to.

    • Derin
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      Been using matrix as my primary communication method (including bridges to other networks for things like Slack and WhatsApp) for over 3 years now, doesn’t feel slow?

      • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I can only tell you my experience using several different softwares across several different hardwares across several different servers on several different networks.

        At some point I got fed up with waiting 10-20 seconds for new messages to load every time I opened the apps.

        And I’m not the only one.

        • Derin
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Might need to check your setup. But, I will concede that after 2 years in - a point at which the DB grew into something massive, what with the massive Matrix rooms I was idling in - I started to notice slowdowns. The whole sliding sync proxy thing (with the new generation Element X clients) fixed everything.

          You shouldn’t be having 10-20 second syncs with a new deploy (and limiting the amount of massive rooms your users can join, depending on your hardware), might be something awry relating to your config. If you’re absolutely certain it’s not that, check out the sliding sync proxy until it gets merged into the main spec - it’s great.

          • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I’ve just told you I’ve “checked my setup” a thousand times. I’ve also stated dozens of people also agree with me. So either you put some fancy wizardry into your system or you’re just in denial.

            Either way, I’m done being gaslighted and trying to fix a “setup” that don’t exist.

            • Derin
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Sorry man, I don’t know what to tell you. I’ve got a pretty medium end VPS on which I host my Matrix instance - only had to add an extension for storage after the first few years when the DB got too big. Things were never as bad as you said early on, and as time passed I absolutely got to the point where it would take 10-20 seconds to sync - but this was after 2 years or so of constant use.

              The reason why it takes long is because of the size of the sync payload - logically, for a new server/user, this really shouldn’t be that big (unless you’re in rooms like Matrix HQ). So, genuinely, look into optimization: postgres, your web server (nginx, apache, caddy), and limiting your users from accessing “problematic” rooms.

              Barring that just deploy the sliding sync proxy and be done with it. It’s not really a problem that requires you to attempt it a thousand times.

              So either you put some fancy wizardry into your system or you’re just in denial.

              It’s called pure Debian, baby. Also, you’ll need a decent chunk of RAM if you don’t have that yet. Avoid a pagefile if you can.

              • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                So, genuinely, look into optimization: postgres, your web server (nginx, apache, caddy), and limiting your users from accessing “problematic” rooms.

                Genuinely: no. I’m done.