• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    By that logic using a VCR to record television and fast-forwarding adverts is piracy.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 months ago

      And you see digital tv providers trying to implement fast forward blockers without chasing away their customers too much

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        Any time I fast forward and have to wait for a commercial that interrupted my fast forwarding, it’s an immediate cancelation of the service and I’m on the phone with customer support to try and get my couple of bucks for that month back.

        Fuck your shitty service, I’m grabbing my hat and sword.

    • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      That argument was in fact made when VCRs first came out. I don’t remember how exactly it played out but in the end the courts here in the US said that VCRs were fine.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      The agreement isn’t that you watch the ad, but that you allow the ad to play on your device. That’s it. Whether or not you see it or hear it doesn’t matter; the “cost” for this type of content is a few moment of your device’s time, not your attention.