• Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      119
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If only the owner of those churches was one of the wealthiest organizations on the planet… Oh, wait

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I know it’s just another type of lawful evil, but if it helps, I used to work in those types of insurance claims and we denied every single one where they knew or should have known about it (and the rapists themselves were never covered).

            I quit, because generallyfuck that, but part of what made me leave was the experience of gathering lists of credibly accused priests and finding their earliest accusation. Any wrongdoing after that could be considered expected and there would be no coverage for it. At the very most, we covered the person who initially hired the perpetrator, but only until the point that they should have fired them (first complaint, sketchy behavior, etc.). If they ignored or reassigned the priest into a new position with access to children, then often even that was denied.

            I’ve since moved to another country, where insurance works completely differently (and the church is in nearly every country), so they definitely have a variety of policies, but at least in the US, you can’t insure expected or intended consequences with most companies, and you can’t insure illegal conduct at all.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      This monument was paid by indulgences. ADs on top of it are free money for the church they can spend brainwashing people into their cult.