• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Projectivy launcher, problem solved adequately duct taped.

    Stop connecting your TVs directly to the internet, I don’t care what OS it’s running. The trend is clear with TV manufacturers, and if your current TV OS doesn’t yet inject ads into your streaming box’s HDMI stream, why risk it updating? Because that’s coming soon enough, and I imagine what it does, an update requiring your TV to have internet connection won’t be far behind.

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 days ago

      Projectivy is great. Some bugs here and there, but overall I love the much simpler UI and that I can actually keep my “continue watching” row at the top.

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yeah a alternative launcher is the way to go, I use FL launcher but it’s similar. And what I like about android on the TV is that you at least get access to the system via adb and can turn off some things like the default launcher.

    • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      This still needs lots of improvement I think. Accidentally removed an app from favourites and now it’s nowhere to be found?

      I love the look and feel, but it’s far from the perfect launcher.

  • PlantPowerPhysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    22 days ago

    I recently bought a projector that I had to trick into not connecting to Wifi by telling it that it was connected to ethernet until it gave up. It will never know the wifi password. It gets an HDMI signal, it shows the HDMI signal, that is its purpose.

  • RxBrad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    22 days ago

    I just don’t connect my Hisense to the Internet, and let my Nvidia Shield TV do all the “Smart” stuff. 🤷‍♂️

  • node815@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    22 days ago

    I have a TCL ROKU TV which is way too chatty on my network. It sends every single keypress on the remote to their servers (just look into the dev console which is easy enough to see what is logged). I have an adblock dns server on my network

    These are just in the last 23 minutes of the hour. As I understand, it’s not always doing this if they are not blocked, but when you block them, it starts to panic!

    The advantage of doing this is instead of having the ad on the right side of the home menu, I have a nice translucent adbox with nothing in it… Also, if you look up the secret codes for Roku menus, you can also toggle the ad server they use so sometimes if some slip through, you get some in house tested ones which are sometimes funny. But that’s extremely rare for us.

    Our next TV will probably be a display or offline only and be a streaming box with custom firmware such as Librelec or something else when the time comes.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I can’t find the source, but at some point there were reports of a fridge with a WiFi module that would overheat and die if you blocked it at the router.

  • blindsight@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    The author of the article is under the mistaken impression that bundling the “smart” features into the TV increases the price. It’s actually the opposite.

    By injecting ads and bloatware into the TVs, the manufacturers earn more money, by far, than the cost of the features. A dumb TV would cost more.

    The best solution is to decouple them; get the cheapest TV you can with the video quality/size you want, then attach your own device to stream content. I use a modified Fire Stick due to price, mostly with Stremio/Torrentio/Debrid, but there are lots of options.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      that works until they start connecting to wifi networks that are open, or to which they somehow got to know the credentials

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Fake news, as far as I can tell. Lots of claims this is happening, but nobody has brought receipts. Considering how easy it would be to catch, and how likely illegal it is to connect to and use networks without permission, this is definitely an urban legend.

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          Lots of claims this is happening

          I don’t know of this is happening, but I don’t see how a small automatic updare couldn’t “add this feature”

          Considering how easy it would be to catch,

          how easy it would be?

          • blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Super easy. Anyone who knows networking could detect new device connections on an open network they set up. I know next to nothing about networking and I could set it up in 10 minutes, 5 of which would be finding my old router in the basement.

            So I’m not going to give this a moment’s thought until someone brings receipts. It’s not hard to check if this is happening.

            • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              Anyone who knows networking could detect new device connections on an open network they set up.

              assuming that it will connect to your network. if it connects anywhere else, good luck to figure it out. at that point you can throw a laptop with capturing all nearby wifi traffic and hope you somehow recognize the TV if it appears among the possibly dozens of other devices

              • blindsight@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                I don’t think you’re understanding how trivial this is to detect:

                Set up an open WiFi network in an area without any other open WiFi networks. i.e. almost anywhere outside of dense urban areas. Then you don’t even need to inspect traffic, just look at connected devices in admin controls. No devices should be connected aside from your monitoring device.

                There’s no way the TV manufacturers are going to risk the legal quagmire that would come from this when there’s no plausible way to keep it remotely secret.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        This, or show an annoying popup over the screen saying it can’t connect to network and wifi needs to be configured

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 days ago

      Nah. Not good enough for me. I thought I would just do that but the thing still has to boot android in order to show you the HDMI input. So it has to constantly suck power like a vampire in order to keep a SoC running, and if it loses power, it has to boot the system again.

      I got a cheap TCL and it smells like burning plastic, even when its “off”. I suspect it’s because of that SoC constantly running.

      Next time I’m buying a computer monitor instead of a smart-but-not-connected TV.

      • oldfart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        ??? I got a Sharp Android TV this year and it just works without connecting

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      You seem to be under the impression that Roku and Chromecast don’t do the exact same things.

      There is no good solution because connecting a Pi or something is not as good as modern TVs without an AV1 decoder and it also doesn’t have a good remote interface as far as I know.

      • No1@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I went down the Pi 4B with Kodi path. It wasn’t very reliable. It was just sometimes when I went to watch something, it just was broken. And I had to go through troubleshooting instead of watching whatever I had turned it on for.

        I ended up with an Amazon firestick. Even using Kodi (and smarttube) on that works faster and more reliably.

        But then I have the Amazon firestick nosing around in everything I do lol. But I did disconnect my TV from the internet…

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I have an old laptop with Linux Mint hooked to my TV. Firefox with some bookmarks to different streaming services, Freetube with subscriptions, sunshine/moonlight to my gaming PC and emulators to play some retro adventures with my kids. I remote controll it with KDE Connect from my phone. Works great!
    I used to fiddle with Kodi on a Raspberry Pi, but the laptop is so simple and easy to set up, I don’t see myself going back.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      You don’t even need a laptop for all of this, you can use your phone.

      I stream games with it all the time.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        My phone doesn’t have HDMI, I don’t know how to share the screen with my TV. Plus I have an USB drive with a lot of movies attached to the computer.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          You can plug one of these things into the USB-C port of your phone and it basically turns it into a little PC.

          Edit: My phone is old and was cheap, so I use an active USB-C to Hdmi converter.

          • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            This looks like it costs more than my old laptop, which I saved from becoming e-waste. But I tend to forget we’re already living in the future and hubs like this exists. So, thanks for reminding me, I’ll look into it. :)

    • SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      Monitors are starting to move in this direction. Samsung has a notorious 5k Apple Studio competitor that wants to connect to the Internet and uses the same interface as their Galaxy smartphones.

      Standby. Winter is coming for monitors as well.

  • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    I have my Google TV in apps only mode. If Google can still see that I pirate literally everything I watch, and circumvent YouTube ads with it then, well, maybe it sends a message.

  • petenu@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    I am still using a dumb LG TV from the before times, and love it. I fear the day that I need to replace it.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    If it was dumb then how would it collect your data and show you ads?

    Anyway modern TVs are expensive to produce to they artificially lower the price by making money elsewhere. (Just look at the buttons on your remote)

    If you want a dump TV you could look into digital signage. Spoiler: it is $$$$$

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I do appreciat the fact that sony TVs have native android, the TV menues are also more intuative IMO

      Though regardless of the TVs OS, its best to not plug a TV directly into the internet. If you can afford it, get a dedicated android box, fire stick, or any other smart dongle you can afford.

      TVs, your kitchen fridge, or even cars now seem to be a privacy nightmare. Updates also dont happen often enough or the manufacture chooses to drop support leaving consumers home networks at risk.

      • ihatetheworld@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        Wouldn’t the android box, fire stick connecting the internet be doing the same thing that you don’t want your smart TV to be doing?

        I always always thought getting one of those was to either circumvent the TV OS limitation (Example LG webOS) or to improve user experience on entry level smart TV or older smart TV.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          The one upside to a dedicated streaming box is the guaranteed security updates.

          Netflix for example may choose to support the app on your fire stick or nvidia shield for a longer time then on a specific TV.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Mine is fine. But I don’t really have experience with any other smart TVs.

      I’ve installed Projectivy launcher since Google mandated 50% of your home screen being an ad, though.

    • Johnny Wishbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      No I specifically bought a Sony for my parents for ease of use and it is one of the worst purchases I have ever made.

      I picked this specific model after looking for 3 months.

      No where in any of the documentation or reviews did it say by plugging in a HDD I can only record a channel if I’m watching it and not record one channel while watching another which is a total deal breaker.

      Also it has developed a fault where it basically shits its self every couple of weeks and the picture pixelates. It needs to be unplugged for a week and plugged back in. I’ve tried a new power pack but it doesn’t really help. The only other thing I could do is get a new main board but can’t source one with 6 months of searching eBay.

      Do yourself a favour and buy a cheap LG panel and stick a streaming stick in it and never connect it to the internet.

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        by plugging in a HDD I can only record a channel if I’m watching it and not record one channel while watching another

        That actually makes sense if we’re talking DVB-[C, S or T] channels received through an internal hardware tuner. A tuner can only tune in on one frequency at once. To record one channel while watching another, it would need to have two internal tuners, which isn’t very common and, I’d say, not something to expect unless specifically advertised.

        Also it has developed a fault where it basically shits its self every couple of weeks and the picture pixelates. It needs to be unplugged for a week and plugged back in.

        Warranty?