• SuperIce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    He shared an article about how he’s changing the military. The article had the insignia in its thumbnail. I strongly dislike Trump, but this article is dumb.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    … consisted of a link to an article featuring the image of a downward pointing pink triangle with a prohibition sign over the top of it.

    That’s more on Washington Post than Trump.

    Doesn’t make much sense to me tho, so the graphic is about an ad where… military is against eradication of lgbtq people? Or did they see someone wearing a pink triangle for solidarity or something and thought it was a woke symbol? Or is it meaningless beyond a dogwhistle? Or was it for free advertising by people outraged by it?

  • fieryhamster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    They round up gays and there would be no male Republicans left. Let’s be honest, virtually all of them are in the closet which is why they are so anti-gay. They are ashamed of what they really are.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      By this logic everyone who’s anti-Nazi is a closeted Nazi. What is wrong with you?

      • fieryhamster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You really have never worked with politicians and it shows with that comment. I’ve worked on campaigns. Republican campaigns. So ask me… how would I know?

        Not to mention Grindr activity jumps 166% during their conventions.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This isn’t a case of logic, it’s a case of observation.

        It’s also a joke. There are very few Democrat leaders that get involved in gay sex scandles, not because they don’t have gay sex, but that their base doesn’t care. Most of us just call it “sex” unless we have a specific need to differentiate. Some additional factor is required to make it a scandal.

        Republicans, though, officially disapprove of gay sex. So anytime one of them is caught having any, automatic scandal.