• MMEnterprises@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Isn’t the error of this obvious based on the last three months versus the last four years?

    Working class left and right likely do have way more in common than they realize, but the difference is not inconsequential for working class.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Of course you do. If every leftist converts one person to leftism…

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So you’re saying lemmy political threads, including this one, are actually upperclass propaganda. Have to admit that’s one angle I never thought of.

  • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    You mean right vs further right? Liberal vs Fascist? Bc those are two sides of the same coin

    socialist agitprop has nothing to do with the distraction of the “culture war”

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The right have completely bought into capitalist propaganda and because of that political solidarity with them is near impossible. For one to be free one must liberate their body and mind, if a populous frees themselves from capitalist oppression without class consciousness they will create a new capitalist class. We must educate them when possible but violently resist them when we must, sadly their alligence to tyranny will require resistance.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 hours ago

    only

    There are significant differences, that we should never brush aside.

    And also, we have much more in common than most realize, and we should find a way to work together on those things.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah, lowering taxes for the rich and increasing taxes for the rich are really just two sides of the same coin! Privatisation? Nationalization? Potato potahto! Dumbest shit I’ve heard all night, and I listen to myself when I talk.

  • MooseyMoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The idea of “middle class” is more relevant imo. There are only the rich parasites and the working class.

    • NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      And the working class trying to be rich parasites. Anyone can trade shares now. Anyone with a pension is heavily invested.

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I mean that they’re heavily invested in the system because they’ve got something to lose. As in, they don’t want the system to end even though they’re suffering because they might lose their chance to retire and their accumulated wealth.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Sounds like something an upper-class leftist would say.

      An upper-class rightist would claim they were on the side of farmers, and rugged individualists, putting them ostensibly on the side of people who work for a living, while the left is more concerned with organization.

      There is a lot of truth to the meme. In recent history, only one person has united the working class across the political spectrum.

      New York and the Federal Government are trying to execute him.

      • Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        An upper-class rightist would claim

        I am asking you to look past vapid “claims” and look at both means and ends of the ideologies themselves. Anyone can just lie lmao

      • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I hear what you’re saying, but an upper-class leftist is really just a right-wing neoliberal (perhaps socially left, but still pro capital/ pro worker exploitation). Leftism doesn’t exist in the US outside of Bernie Sanders and maybe AOC.

        I’m not sure we know enough about Luigi’s politics to call him leftist. Didn’t he praise silicon valley execs? Sure, he may have united leftists (anti capitalists) and the working class. But the working class, itself, is right wing in the US. They don’t have class consciousness. There are hints that it remains, like how many Trumpies also voted for AOC, or how many like Bernie. But if they’re voting along party lines, they often do so against their own interests.

        An upper class rightist might claim they’re on the side of workers, but they do so while reaching into their pockets and stealing a chunk of the value that they create. Then they reassure those same workers that wealth will somehow trickle down to them.

        Edit: There is only really truth to this meme if you treat “left vs right” in the American sense of the words, or just replace them with “democrats vs republicans” or “liberals vs conservatives,” none of which are actually leftists in the classical sense.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Every down vote you’ve received is from someone who keeps us from building the guillotines.

        • Chakravanti@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This guy gets it.

          Left, Left, Left, Right, Oh Left Right…

          Suckers. You’re both steps to kill anyone that ain’t them.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m paid a tiny fraction of the value of my labour just like everyone else, don’t try to make this a purity test.

        You’re talking about Luigi I take it? He did good but he’s hardly a leader, but hopefully his example inspires more direct action.

  • henry1917@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The term Left was literally invented to mean the French Revolutionaries, the people who used the guillotines!

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The term Left was literally invented to mean the French Revolutionaries,

      When was it co-opted?

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There’s a term for people who want to support the working class against the ruling class and it’s “the left.”

  • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Democrats vs Republicans would be more accurate imo. OP, it sounds like you’re not using left and right in the classical politcal sense, but in the way these terms are thrown around nowadays, especially in the US – leftism being neoliberalism, and the right being…whatever it is now. Neo-conservativism? Both are right wing ideologies.

    quick wikipedia snippet

    In modern politics, the term Left typically applies to ideologies and movements to the left of classical liberalism, supporting some degree of democracy in the economic sphere. Today, ideologies such as social liberalism and social democracy are considered to be centre-left, while the Left is typically reserved for movements more critical of capitalism,[9] including the labour movement, socialism, anarchism, communism, Marxism, and syndicalism, each of which rose to prominence in the 19th and 20th centuries.