Whilst Google announced a ton of AI powered features for Android 14 at Google I/O, it seems like most of them will be Pixel exclusive…

Hoping Samsung does more with OneUI 6 since Google’s really pushing for Pixel exclusivity on Android now 🙄

  • AlmostDachshund@rammy.site
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Android 14 is the most underwhelming updated yet. Google didn’t even promote it well on I/O. About OneUI 6, I just wish Samsung updates the control center. It’s too outdated. I know it’s simple and working well, but I would love some visual tweaks.

      • SuperSpruce@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You now can’t even sideload an app with a target SDK level that is too low. This locks you out of a bunch of older abandoned FOSS apps that often are very lightweight on storage.

        • Devgard@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          sidenote: what is the purpose of the target SDK? why do both minimum and target SDKs have to exist?

          • henfredemars@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The purpose is backward and forward compatibility respectively.

            The minimum version is the easiest to explain: any older, and your app just won’t run. Don’t even try. I (app) don’t have the compatibility code to work with you if you are older than my minimum version because I didn’t choose to include it, and you (Android) don’t know the changes that were made in the future platform versions, so you can’t help me.

            Target version is a little more complex. This is the version of the API that I am designed to run with. You can use this information to set compatibility parameters for forward compatibility. For example, if I try to use API that doesn’t exist in your version or that would have had different behavior, you would know what I’m expecting because I declared to you what it was designed for at the time. This allows the system to tolerate your outdatedness better.

            However, that compatibility feature sometimes leads to security issues because the new API tends to be more restricted or improved in ways that enhance security and privacy, hence the argument why there should be a minimum target version to express that you cannot use the less secure API even for the sake of compatibility.

  • TheYang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    having only just moved to android 13, it seems a bit weird

    but as someone without google apps… Android updates don’t seem to change a lot anymore

  • vividspecter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m hoping for opus Bluetooth support in AOSP and not just for Pixel. Better yet if it was the pipewire version (which is more extensive) but I doubt that.