• funkless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fax machine actually had a massive impact on society and is much older than you think (newer than the telegram, older than the telephone, and in use during Abraham Lincolns life time).

    Just because it’s usefulness had declined in the prior 10 years to him making that statement, doesn’t mean it didn’t affect the economy.

    In the year 2100 or 2200 the internet as we know it may have been superceded by methodologies we can’t even comprehend right now.

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read a follow up quote somewhere the last time I saw this that he said it sucks to be remembered for one dumb quote- though I feel like by ‘98 you’d have a better read than that, the internet wasn’t “new” in 98. The iMac which famously shipped with a built in 56k modem came out in 97.

    • deong@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will say, the internet in 1998 looked nothing like the internet today. There was barely any commerce at all. 1998 is maybe the year you’d start to say that Amazon “made it”, but even then the common take from established reporters was that they’d never be able to compete with brick and mortar booksellers like Barnes and Noble. To the extent that the average person was even aware that you could buy things on the internet, it was mostly because they’d heard that it was dangerous to use your credit card online.

      At the time, the web was still pretty small. Google launched in 1998 – prior to that Yahoo was the most popular “search engine”, but Yahoo was mostly a human-curated list of web pages organized by topic. Windows 95 was still what most people used, and it didn’t even come with a TCP/IP stack enabled.

      Certainly not a brilliant prediction, but it’s hindsight that takes it from “pretty mediocre take” to “comically stupid”.

      • somas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @deong

        @AlmightySnoo @carl_dungeon

        Certainly not a brilliant prediction, but it’s hindsight that takes it from “pretty mediocre take” to “comically stupid”.

        The quote points out exactly why an expert in one field, economics, shouldn’t be assumed to be an expert in adjacent fields, how technological progression will make new forms of business possible

    • TerabyteRex@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a 2013 interview, Krugman stated that the predictions were meant to be “fun and provocative, not to engage in careful forecasting”

    • Bojimbo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a real Nobel Prize, it’s a Bank of Sweden prize and it’s a better reflection of Swedish economic politics than true innovation in the field (probably because economics is more applied philosophy than science).

  • zerbey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lots of people at that time thought the Internet was a passing fad. Me, a computer expert (supposedly), though the iPad was a silly idea and nobody would want a less functional laptop. Ah well, we all make mistakes.

  • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I saw NCSA Mosaic in February (March?) of '93 and remarked to the user that it didn’t seem to be anything special, and that I could get all that information on Gopher or Archie. They thought I was crazy.

    By July I’d changed my mind and told my wife that in a few years there would be plumbing trucks with web addresses on them instead of 800 numbers. She thought I was crazy.

    Maybe I’m just crazy?