11/10/21(Wed)18:07:27 No.158997931
>>158997375 (OP) #
>psychiatrist asks what I enjoy doing
>tell him I like doing “image edits”
>he asks if l ever post them
>l tell him I do and that they’re used by other people and potentialy seen millions of times but it’s all posted anonymously
>he gets really interested and asks to see
>show him over 100 original pepe edits
>he says he’s seen the character before
>next session
>him and 2 other psychiatrists are in the room, says he invited them to help me
>they ask more about my memes
>show them my greentexts which were reposted by redditors and got tens of thousands, up to millions of views
>show them my original memes that have “know your meme” pages or big online presences >they’re recording me and taking notes the whole time through
>get uncomfortable and don’t book a follow-up appointment
>doctor has offered to cover all further sessions and meet with me 3 times a week as a “case study”

  • adj16@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes everyone, you’re very clever. This is not a real story. But it’s very in-theme for the community and is pretty entertaining so

    • omgarm@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I am pretty sure all stories on 4chan (or at least /b/) are fake and non-heterosexual.

      • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

    • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The funny thing is we literally don’t and may never know if it’s a real story or not. Weird shit happens all the time, someone’s bound to post about it.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, its not completely outside the realms of possibility. I imagine regular frogposters arent the kind of people to go into therapy and talk about frogposting.

      The psychology of 4chan users would certainly be interesting if dissected by professionals actually speaking with the users in person, definitely a paper worth reading. Not saying that its real, just that its not completely impossible.

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I mean, it actually is completely outside the realms of possibility? You could lose your license for ambushing a patient with 2 other psychiatrists who haven’t been previously approved by the patient to receive a case history.

        Like, I was amused by the story, but let’s not pretend this is has any relationship with a factual reality

        • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          no. additional psychiatrists is not a bad thing, and when studying an interesting case more psychiatrists is better. but the fact that anon was “ambushed” means either the story is fake or anon goes to a career oriented psychiatrist and not a patient oriented one.

          lets not forget, psychiatrists are human too.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            The text doesn’t necessarily need to be a 1:1 recounting of events. If this weren’t fake, what would have been said is “Anon, I have these two other psychiatrists who I would like to assist me, is it okay for them to be present during our sessions”

            Still a shitty thing to do when they could have just asked before hand as to not put them on the spot.

            • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              no serious psychiatrist would risk their patient trust pulling something like that. but there is a considerable percentage of non-serious psychiatrists out there.

              but lets face it, a truly anonymous creator would be a career making case study.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Definitely, but it is quite fitting that the first known one to say it is a psychiatrist working on a paper lmfao

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 months ago

    Generally the additional psychologists could risk losing their license to practice or they could get served a malpractice lawsuit if they were to leak anything from the session, but I think it’s still worth stating that if they are not your doctor and you are not their client then you do not necessarily have confidentiality and you should be worried about that until you have an agreement in writing.

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        As the psychologist of the patient referenced in the story, I’m incensed at the suggestion it is untrue. My credentials are on file with all the relevant authorities if you must check.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          As the frog referenced in the story, I’m incensed at the fact that it is no longer Wednesday, my dudes.

      • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean there’s hardly any repercussions for posting most places any more. Sure some places there’s the potential of a ban, but that’s hardly a deterrent.