Ex-CIA software engineer who leaked to WikiLeaks sentenced to 40 years
2 Feb 2024
Joshua Schulte had been found guilty of handing over classified materials in so-called Vault 7 leak.
 |
|---|
| The so-called Vault 7 leak was a major embarrassment for the CIA [File: Larry Downing/Reuters] |
A former CIA software engineer has been sentenced to 40 years in prison for leaking classified information and possessing child sexual abuse material.
Joshua Schulte, 35, was found guilty in 2022 of four counts each of espionage and computer hacking and one count of lying to FBI agents after handing over classified materials to whistleblowing organisation WikiLeaks.
Schulte was also convicted of contempt of court and making false statements in 2020, and possession of child abuse material last year.
The bulk of the sentence announced on Thursday was imposed over the so-called Vault 7 leak, which revealed embarrassing details of the CIA’s spying overseas.
The leak, which the CIA called a “digital Pearl Harbor”, showed how US spies hacked Apple and Android smartphones and sought to turn internet-connected televisions into listening devices.
The security breach prompted US officials to plan for an “all-out war” against Wikileaks, including discussing the possible kidnapping or assassination of its founder Julian Assange, Yahoo News reported, citing anonymous officials.
Assange was indicted on espionage charges in 2019 – a move that prompted condemnation by press freedom organisations – and is currently in Britain fighting extradition to the US.
Judge Jesse M Furman said the full extent of the damage caused by Schulte would likely never be known “but I have no doubt it was massive”.
Furman said Schulte had also continued to commit crimes while in jail by trying to leak more classified materials and by creating a hidden file on his computer that contained child sexual abuse images.
US Attorney Damian Williams said in a statement that Schulte had committed some of the “most brazen, heinous crimes of espionage in American history”.
“He caused untold damage to our national security in his quest for revenge against the CIA for its response to Schulte’s security breaches while employed there,” Williams said.
Addressing the court ahead of his sentencing, Schulte complained about harsh conditions he had endured in detention, including being denied hot water and being subjected to constant noise and artificial light.
Schulte also said it was unfair for prosecutors to seek a life sentence as they had previously offered a plea deal that would have seen him sentenced to 10 years in prison.
“This is not justice the government seeks, but vengeance,” he said.
Of course he was possessing child porn.
Everyone who try to slander America is inherently evil. The CIA will findout about their wrongdoings. They are always guilty of a crime even if they don’t know it yet.
Well I do wonder if the CIA planted it on him
Probably filmed it themselves as well tbh
of course they did, it happens so damn often when someone runs afoul of the CIA but the CIA doesn’t want to outright murder them
The leak, which the CIA called a “digital Pearl Harbor”, showed how US spies hacked Apple and Android smartphones and sought to turn internet-connected televisions into listening devices.
It’s very funny to me that every time something is leaked the CIA forgets to save face. Like “Oh no! Someone caught me hacking into personal smart devices and using them to spy on the public! This is my personal 9/11 and I’m sad about it. :(”
They really ought to just start forgoing the planting of child porn, it’s just weird at this point and you’ve already shown that you can arrest folks for more arbitrary reasons. But I guess cruelty is the point. “Don’t leak our shit or I’ll make people believe you diddle kids!”
Do courts leave out context for determining intent regarding the possession of CSAM?
Even for cases of killing someone the sentencing depends on intent like manslaughter vs murder.
What kind of court system does the US have if whistleblowers of these bourgeoisie government sponsored criminal institutions get convicted with obviously fabricated evidence?
