A lot of the times this comes down to a user error.
For example, very similar to your case, I knew someone that enabled Cloudtrail, and configured some things to have Cloudtrail logs dumped on S3. Guess what? Dumping things on S3 also creates a Cloudtrail that gets logged to S3 that Cloudtrail logs. Etc
Doing things like that and creating a loop can get you massive bills
Probably the best thing Ubisoft released since assassin’s creed black flag
They were streets ahead in their logo design…
That explains why that one junior developer that keeps force-pushing and keeps breaking my build server went into hiding
We also got fully self driving cars in 2 years though, in 2016…
Snowe is sysadmin of programming.dev…
So source: Snowe
If you’re using Entity Framework for the mssql, I doubt that this library would work as a substitute.
Because that linq gets parsed into expression trees and then send to the underlying provider (mssql/mysql etc) to be converted into sql. So if you you some non-standard library those providers won’t be able to convert that linq to sql
Typescript itself is not really getting any faster, just transpiling Typescript to Javascript
Many people believe that the ToS was added to make Mozilla legally able to train AIs on the collected data.
“Don’t attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence”
So yea Mozilla wrote some terms that where ambiguous and could be interpreted in different ways, and ‘many people believed’ that they did this intentionally and had the worst intentions possible by their interpretation of the new ToS
Then Mozilla rewrote that ToS after seeing how people were interpreting the original ToS:
https://www.theverge.com/news/622080/mozilla-revising-firefox-terms-of-use-data
And yea, now ‘many people will believe’ that ‘Mozilla revised their decision to do this after the backslash’ - OR, it was never their intention and now phrased it better after the confusion
People just want to get their pitchforks out and start drama at any possible opportunity without evidence of wrongdoing… Mozilla added stupid stuff to the ToS, ok yea fair enough - but if they actually did “steal user data” - this would be very easily detectable with Wireshark or something
“It’s against the law to export to china, but they’re doing it anyways.”
“What if we prevent it by making it even more against the law?”
Right…
This feels like a personal attack
Programming.dev is hosting Iceshrimp: https://bytes.programming.dev/
You could host your own instance, or if your opinion-pieces are programming related, post them there
It probably depends on the level of the criminals and organized crime groups. I saw this Youtube video a couple weeks ago that talks about the history of how organized crime groups were using encrypted communication https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gigIOc_0PKo (And how they were honey-potted by the FBI to use an FBI-hosted service, lol)
Organized crime groups that make 100s of millions should be capable enough to hire skilled developers and sysops to host self-managed services. At some point if they make enough money, investing in self-managed communication becomes preferable over using telegram or signal.
No one’s questioning why he’s sorting it twice?
It’s called embeddings in other models as well:
https://huggingface.co/blog/getting-started-with-embeddings
https://ollama.com/blog/embedding-models
Also some feedback, a bit more technical, since I was trying to see how it works, more of a suggestion I suppose
It looks like you’re looping through the documents and asking it for known tags, right? ({str(db.current_library.tags)}.)
I don’t know if I would do this through a chat completion and a chat response, there are special functions for keyword-like searching, like embeddings. It’s a lot faster, and also probably way cheaper, since you’re paying barely anything for embeddings compared to chat tokens
So the common way to do something like this in AI would be to use Vectors and embeddings: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/embeddings
So - you’d ask for an embedding (A vector) for all your tags first. Then you ask for embeddings of your document.
Then you can do a Nearest Neighbor Search for the tags, and see how closely they match
Although I agree with the sentiment - the article mentions that it’s “only” regarding about 1 mil people. (Probably South Korean users)
So it’s still a $15 fine per violation. Could have been much higher, sure, but I don’t know if that’s a good return of investment for Facebook.
Maybe this case sets an example for other countries or regulatory bodies to start issuing fines to Facebook as well
I’m not entirely sure what you hope to achieve: have a GPG encrypted subject, and have ThunderBird automatically understand that it’s encrypted, so it can be automatically decrypted?
Since you’re saying you’re building software to support this, what are you building? A ThunderBird plugin that can do this? Or just standalone software that you want to make compatible with ThunderBird default way of handling encryption?
There’s a Python WASM runtime, if you really want to run python in a browser for some reason…
For example: You can deploy your Python script as a Lambda. Imagine somewhere in the Python script you’d call your own lambda - twice. You basically turned your lambda into a Fork Bomb that will spawn infinite lambdas