• AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    They probably don’t want all those people realizing they can install extensions manually, because then they’d need to actively scan for and block extension installations.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or realizing they can stick to an older Chrome version with V2 extensions that retain full capabilities…

      • bluefirex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        That will stop working way sooner than you’d like. Freezing a browser isn’t tenable at all, not just for features websites are expecting but also security issues. There’s a reason every browser except Safari has a 6 weeks release cycle.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Web tech doesn’t evolve that fast. You can use a 1 year old version today without worrying about missing any website functionality.

          What you’re missing is features that the browser itself introduces, but in this case those would be anti-features so arguably Chrome will be getting worse.

          Then there’s of course the security vulnerabilities.

          Of course the whole discussion is moot since there’s a much simpler alternative, switching to another browser.