Nearing the filling of my 14.5TB hard drive and wanting to wait a bit longer before shelling out for a 60TB raid array, I’ve been trying to replace as many x264 releases in my collection with x265 releases of equivalent quality. While popular movies are usually available in x265, less popular ones and TV shows usually have fewer x265 options available, with low quality MeGusta encodes often being the only x265 option.

While x265 playback is more demanding than x264 playback, its compatibility is much closer to x264 than the new x266 codec. Is there a reason many release groups still opt for x264 over x265?

  • Kir
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve always wanted to do that, but how do you handle seeding?

    • zeluko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Just keep it seeding?
      Of course if you want both, best space saving would be to use the same file.
      I have multiple servers, so it doesnt really matter anyways, one machine downloads and seeds via its SSD and theother is just for storage on HDDs. Though i could setup tiered storage in this scenario to be able to seed more with same SSD strorage amount.

    • Nimmo@lem.nimmog.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ah, fair point. I don’t use torrents, my media comes from usenet, so that doesn’t need to factor into my thinking.

      My (overly?) Complex setup does allow me to resort to torrents as a last resort, but that happens on another machine outside my home network and gets synchronised into my home via a one-way syncthing share, so even on the rare occasion I have to resort to torrents I can leave it on that server seeding for a few weeks or months.