• Moonrise2473
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    Agree with this

    I am not a native speaker and I never associated gimp with a sex meaning, even if my vocabulary is pretty expanded.

    It could be called “DesirePix 2.0” or “SeductionStudio 4.0” but the main problem is that it gives a worse user experience than using Adobe Photoshop 5.0 on windows 95, on every single aspect. Features, speed, UI, ease of use, and so on

    • Moonrise2473
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Disclaimer: it’s not that I’m denigrating the devs, making a program like gimp is super fucking hard and as a lousy programmer I could never be able to make it better. Ideally, it would need some talented designers to develop a more usable UI.

      I see comparisons to photopea, but that’s a UI clone of Photoshop and that is not really wanted. It also didn’t come with technical debt from the 90s