• Damage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    29 days ago

    What the hell is in those e-mails that requires 2 days of pondering?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Requests for available meeting times. I figure if I drag my feet on scheduling a meeting someone urgently wants to have they’ll eventually just email the fucking questions and save us both 90 minutes of pointless bullshit.

      I actually made an online meeting request process with a minimum 2-week turnaround just to make scheduling meetings with my department annoying. I only have so much time, and if I honored all requests I’d be spending 60+ hours a week in meetings and none actually doing my job.

      • briercreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        In a project manager. Meetings are my job. If I made my customers wait two weeks to schedule a meeting, I’d be fired. Two weeks to hold it? Maybe. Two weeks to schedule? No.

        • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          28 days ago

          Could you perhaps cut down on the number of meetings you have? I’ve found that 99% of meetings I get invited to could usually have been an email or a slack message, but then people just want to waste time talking to make it look like they’re doing stuff instead of actually just doing stuff.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      29 days ago

      “Would you please send me that report we talked about? And also let me know which time period you would travel back to if you had a time machine and could only use it once?”

      • Damage
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        And also let me know which time period you would travel back to if you had a time machine and could only use it once?”

        I mean, is there any valid answer aside from the '90s? '80s were cool but still too backwards, plus you still got the cool stuff from then in the later decade, anything before is “I don’t want to die of a minor sickness” territory.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          29 days ago

          The 1920’s to the 1970’s are a no go just from the leaded gas use alone. Short BttF trip, sure, but I wouldn’t want to live through that shit. If we think micro plastics is bad now, we use to put fast food in styrofoam up to the 80’s.

          • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            29 days ago

            Yeah, seems like an exciting way to kill myself. Better than my current life plans so why not? No one said I had to survive in the past, just visit.

            • Revan343@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              Oh I’d try my best to survive. I wonder how much shit I can cram in the time machine; I can probably rig a generator to run off a wood fire

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                The first diesel engine ran on coal dust. I’m sure you could modify a diesel generator to run on charcoal dust, which you could make with a wood fire.

                • Revan343@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  I had been thinking straight-up steam, hadn’t even considered charcoal/bio diesel.

                  Though I do like the wood gas idea; should be easy to retune a propane engine for it

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I personally ignore emails with vague responses, especially if they treat email like a text message. Im not interested in instant communication via email.

      For example:

      “Can we meet?”

      Should have answered the 5 Ws and name a time so the email is actionable. Otherwise I’ll boomerang it and reply in a few days.

      • Damage
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yeah but this person isn’t simply ignoring it, they eventually answer, allegedly after long consideration.