We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

    • goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      hey I’ll have you know I keep all my broken earbuds in the same box in the garage with all the other cables and assorted dongles I can no longer identify and will likely never use, like any responsible citizen should

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you think Bluetooth earphones won’t also be in that pile once the batteries stop holding charge after 2 years, you’re in for a world of dissapointing sex

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        My AirBudz are over five years old and still play for like five hours before I need to charge them… and I used them 40+ hours daily for all of those years.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        My point wasn’t wired vs wireless. It was disposable crap that breaks vs corporations not deliberately making crap the only thing most people can comfortably afford.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          But they need to skimp on those few milligram ounces of solder per bud, so that they can make one extra low quality bud!

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch to be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed. Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think earbuds make up a significant percentage of the patch

        Cheap and disposable plastics and electronics IS a significant part of the world garbage problem and yes, plastic particles is MOST of the garbage patch specifically.

        be here virtue signaling and shaming people for what they were encouraged to do by corporate greed

        Whoa, dude, hold your horses! I’m in no way blaming consumers. Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

        Your source says the great majority of the patch comes from agriculture and fishing.

        Ok, admittedly a poor choice of example. Doesn’t invalidate my intended point though, however ill-stated heh

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is tough -

          Making consumer electronics cheap crap that breaks easily and everything of decent quality prohibitively expensive is 100% on the greedy corporations, not their victims the consumers.

          (US here) Gets me thinking about dollar store headphones. Consumers could buy decent headphones for about $10 direct from overseas. When that’s equivalent to more than an hour of wages, there’s still demand for the $1 version. Should this need not be met out of a sense of social responsibility?

          (I don’t have a perfect answer myself)

          Econ 101 on my mind here btw:

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The problem is that our economic system has encouraged an environment where reputation is a thing to be immediately cashed out. You can’t even know if those $10 earbuds are any better than the $1 version.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              You can make some reasonable assumptions although they will be imperfect:

              Wouldn’t be as frequently imperfect if freaking review fraud weren’t entirely ubiquitous (grrrr)

    • marduk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m here for the wired headphone -> pacific garbage patch vs lithium battery child labor -> wireless headphone fight 🍿

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d imagine the limited lifespan of their batteries and the fact that they have ones to begin with would be of bigger concern

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s fair. My first pair still works awesome after five years, and I’ve used them for 40+ hours a week for that whole time. I only have a new pair because I needed ANC, but I still use my old pair to sleep.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think the headphones I’m using are 20 year old. But to be fair, a lot of them either don’t last that long or are simply thrown away for some new thing.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          You might want to edit the comment since in the context it definitely sounds like saying wireless would be better

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not really, no. I’m responding to a comment about cheap buds that break too easily, which isn’t exclusive to wired ones.

            There’s literally no mention of the wired vs wireless aspect in my comment or the one I’m replying to.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired. That’s the context your post is in. And you’ve already had several people misunderstanding your intention because it is written in that context without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                My friend, the whole thread is about wireless vs. wired

                Not my comment. I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect. That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault.

                without clarification that it’s not supposed to be the same as other comments here.

                I’m personally not a big fan of spelling out the obvious, but ok:

                You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I’m clearly commenting on a separate aspect

                  You seem to have been overestimated how clear that was.

                  That others try to ascribe a nonexistent secondary meaning that I haven’t so much as hinted at isn’t my fault

                  That’s just how context works.

                  You’re wrong to assume that my comment follows the previous theme from pure proximity and it’s annoying to have to bend over backwards to facilitate the poor reading comprehension (if not bad faith) of people making up their minds about what I’m saying before reading it.

                  Idk if you know how conversation work but people typically use and understand context. If you don’t mind people misunderstanding you, then no need to do anything. If you do mind it, it might be helpful to spell things out. But it’s up to you really, I don’t mind either way.