tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoI like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1524arrow-down176
arrow-up1448arrow-down1external-linkI like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoSo why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoBut if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoFlatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.
So why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
Removed by mod
But if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
Removed by mod
Flatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.