Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoMicrosoft to Revive Nuclear Plant on Three Mile Island to Handle AI Processingwww.pcmag.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down12cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1210arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft to Revive Nuclear Plant on Three Mile Island to Handle AI Processingwww.pcmag.comArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square57fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down14·21 hours agoThis thing can’t continue.
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eecakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·21 hours agoWhy? It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.
minus-squareQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoYes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·15 hours agoThey intended for it to partially melt down?
minus-squareArxCyberwolf@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·12 hours agoDon’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.
This thing can’t continue.
Why?
It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.
Yes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.
They intended for it to partially melt down?
Don’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.