• NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The free market doesn’t stay free for very long without Government intervention because none of the players in said market want to participate in a free market. They want to gain control of everything and milk it for every dollar of surplus.

        • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          This wasn’t a natural push to a monopoly though. Visa used their size and leverage to force end users to use their debit network and squeeze out the competition. They’d charge higher fees on companies who didn’t use their services. So I disagree, this isn’t a natural monopoly.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            While Visa may have done some unethical things to become the monopoly, the industry would have naturally gone that way no matter what.

            • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              We’re talking about what can be proven, and the DoJ seems to think they can prove Visa drove the market this way. You’re talking about a hypothetical market where Visa didn’t do what they did, which is irrelevant.

  • NastyNative@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What good are regulations you say? We got 2 tiny men with enough wealth to build spaceships. But but but dont worry wealth will twinkle down.