• Cabrio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, you’re both.

    Explain how I’m enabling climate denialism by saying we ignore climate denialists?

    And how are you not the apologist for defending their indefensible position?

    Do you practice being this stupid or does it come naturally?

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Climate denialists claim that climate action is a red herring for socialist changes. You literally are doing that.

      At no point did I defend them. That’s a strawman.

      Insults mean you have run out of actual argument. Sorry about your reading comprehension. That must make it hard for you.

      • Cabrio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it’s a legitimate question. You said objectively incorrect things so you’re either disingenuous (practiced stupid) or just stupid (naturally stupid).

        You could be uneducated but you seem to think you wield cognizance and comprehension with expert skill so I’ll take you at your word and contribute your wilful ignorance to belligerence rather than lack of education.