BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 16 hours agoMan tricks OpenAI’s voice bot into duet of The Beatles’ “Eleanor Rigby”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up152arrow-down1external-linkMan tricks OpenAI’s voice bot into duet of The Beatles’ “Eleanor Rigby”arstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarehendrik@palaver.p3x.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·15 hours agoLol. I’m impressed by the timing. But it seems there is a reason why they don’t want it to sing 🤗
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·14 hours agoAnd that reason is copyright. I’m ready for copyright to be destroyed. We’re aggressively hamstringing human progress due to it, and I’m not even talking about AI.
minus-squaredhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoReally wish more people understood this. Owning information is a horseshit construct with awful consequences. Fuck ip law.
minus-squarehendrik@palaver.p3x.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·12 hours agoSince when do AI companies care about copyright 😆🙃
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 hours agoThey care not during training, but during inference. They censor the outputs hoping to not get sued.
Lol. I’m impressed by the timing. But it seems there is a reason why they don’t want it to sing 🤗
And that reason is copyright.
I’m ready for copyright to be destroyed. We’re aggressively hamstringing human progress due to it, and I’m not even talking about AI.
Really wish more people understood this. Owning information is a horseshit construct with awful consequences. Fuck ip law.
Since when do AI companies care about copyright 😆🙃
They care not during training, but during inference. They censor the outputs hoping to not get sued.