• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Then we lift the restrictions that Clinton put on government housing, and increase the supply.

    I don’t care what the racists trained by the Chicago school of economics say, the real world has only proven them right when the rich are pushing on the scales.

    Keynes is correct, and 2020 proved that far too well, to the point that the rich started screaming about their wage slaves.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Great! I’m all for gov’t increasing housing supply! But, frankly, most of the pushback from building affordable, high-density housing is coming from the local level. If we build high-density, affordable (e.g., low-income only, versus mixed-income) housing in it’s own area, rather than integrating it into existing communities, we’re only building the slums of the future. As it stands, well-off communities, even in areas that are heavily Democratic (such as, most of California), have been strongly opposed to locating such housing in their neighborhoods, and do everything they can to prevent it.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m curious what areas are seeing the gain in YIMBY; I have a hard time thinking that any of it is coming from La Jolla. And yeah, San Diego really needs more high-density housing. I lived there for a few years in the early 90s, and there really wasn’t much at the time.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I live in IB so I don’t hear much from La Jolla. We’ve had several high density low income proposals pass the SD and IB city councils in the last couple years.