• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well, both of us are socialists (I can’t comment on the other person). We think about money in such a different way that any money joke about investment is going to lose it’s humor. I don’t understand it as a joke either, but I definitely understood the financial advice. He selected some large, relatively uncontroversial companies that will pay you part of the quarterly profits based on the number of stocks you own. Tbh I’d avoid the day trading and choose high dividend ETFs instead. $100k is still very out of reach for most people, but it’s a reasonable investing portfolio.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I get conflicting information about high dividend ETFs. Some people swear by them, others say they’re terrible or at least should be avoided. I’m too ignorant to know why either way :/

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        By the nature of ETFs, you’re definitely going to make less income because your money gets put into an investment pool and returns are proportional. However it makes you less tied to the stock market, which is increasingly tied to a person’s ability to retire

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Those are my main investments outside of my 401k from work, I was just curious about the high dividend ones but someone else answered what is going on there. Thanks for the info!

      • sparkee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many people in The US who are trying to save for retirement attempt to have fewer dividends since that becomes taxable income. They would prefer just a higher stock value and pay the taxes later when presumably they are retired and in a lower tax bracket. That premise is probably good but you never know how the government is going to change up tax rates in the future.