• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Supreme Court already rules that not only is Trump all but immune from prosecution, but that he can’t even be investigated or questioned over it.

    So if Trump were to make a phone call and say “Yes, we’re going to sign this into law, and schedule a meeting about that other thing. Oh, and have Tom Hanks killed in a hail of bullets, kthxbye.”, the fact that he ordered Tom Hanks killed might be prosecutable. The problem is that even if they know he ordered Tom Hanks killed, they legally can’t even ask him about it because it happened during an official phone call.

    Trump could go on a crime spree that would make the Mafia legitimately look like choir boys, and Jack Smith…well, Jack Smith isn’t going to be able to do Jack about it.

    January 20, 2025 isn’t a swearing in ceremony. It’s a coronation.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      yep, I hate it but at least it’s starting to sink in. come jan. we are in a functional trump dictatorship. there are no checks and balances left, the court assured so and with the legislative branch under his control, the single, only hope we have is that he’s too hilariously inept to be effective.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        And this didn’t even require a violent takeover like he thought was necessary last time. He was a far worse candidate this time and so much of the American public was eager to throw the power back into his hands, while a sizable chunk did not seem to think it was important enough to go vote against him.

        • 4grams@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Right. And can buy the scorpion and the frog argument the first time around but this time there was NO ambiguity.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            No ambiguity for anybody who cared enough to pay attention anyway!

            It’s like the scorpion only stings while the frog is sleeping, and every morning the scorpion complains about how those damn hornets wearing DNC and BLM shirts came back and stung the frog that the scorpion loves so much. And despite the stings not even looking like hornets did it, the frog is unaware of the concept of confirmation bias and likes what he’s hearing so he just goes with it.

            • 4grams@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m always a fan of torturing a metaphor so yeah, exactly :)

              It’s been going on for ages but at this point I don’t really blame the scorpion anymore. I certainly don’t blame the hornets wearing t-shirts, I mean, I don’t like them and I will try to exterminate them but not by trying to starve them out with scorpion overpopulation.

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                As far as not blaming the scorpion, when you look at it from his perspective Trump is one of the most “successful” people on the planet according to the metrics that matter to him. His shitty behavior is rewarded and reinforced over and over again. Ugh.