• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes sacrifice your livelihood so that someone else can implement the feature anyway.

    Yes, that’s called having a backbone, aligning your actions with your own moral code.

    This is the same logic as ‘well if I had quit my executioner job, someone else would have done it, therefore I am a morally blameless and non hypocritical executioner who is against the death penalty.’

    Just use an ad blocker.

    Obviously this is the easy solution for yourself personally. Costs you nothing, benefits yourself, allows the systemic bad practice to continue.

    The actually accurate analogue would be to contribute toward actually creating or maintaining a free and widely usable adblocker, an alternate platform, to do something that helps other people overcome the problem.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        With a job or other source of income, or lifestyle that propogates/depends on less overall harm.

            • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, I understand the businesses need to have income operate. I’m trying to figure out how you’re planning on running a Video distribution platform and cover cost

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Nebula seems to have figured this out.

                Same with Peer Tube.

                Plenty of ways to run a business or online service or productive enterprise that are not ‘be a shareholder profit driven advertisment company’, just takes a bit of … economic imagination.

                • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Fair enough, hopefully they can scale up.

                  I don’t see the difference in paying for nebula and paying for YouTube though

                  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    ways to run a business or online service or productive enterprise that are not ‘be a **shareholder profit driven advertisment company’, **

                    My whole point here, this whole hill that I have been dying on, is that mass advertisement targeted at people with algorithmic precision is the problem, because its a worst case scenario combination of pushing regressive / fascist propoganda whilst also enriching megacorporations.

                    But your take away was apparently that I was saying something like ‘companies should just provide services/products for free and then just go bankrupt’ … ???

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yep, the classic dilemma of software devs with YouTube on their resume:

        Keep working for YouTube, or never work at any other software company or non profit organization or any other employer that wants software devs, or any other kind of job, and just starve to death.

        Its truly a shame the software dev’s decisions are so binary.