• Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I really don’t see any value in AI art. AI pictures look like slop, AI music sounds soulless, AI writing I guess can be fine but usually sounds weird.

    I just don’t see the value in AI because to me, every use case scenario for anything artistic is justified with a capitalist excuse.

    I’ll give you the organizational ones, that’s understandable and not a bad reason. I suppose I have trouble getting behind taking the soul out of creating something just to slap it on an ad or product to sell something.

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Commodification of art is soul less. Doesn’t matter if a person makes the commodity or a machine. It’s meant to be aesthetically pleasing or elicit an emotion to sell something. It’s not really art anymore than what I’m writing here is art.

      Art is about playful self-expression and often sharing that expression with those who appreciate it.

      And AI creative writing is garbage too. I had Gemini write some poetry for me yesterday out of curiosity, and, as someone that writes poetry, I’ll just say it was formulaic and predictable. It has no understanding of the medium, it’s history, why things are done in certain ways, or ability to play with the many forms poetry may take. It’s a good enough replica for people who want to write a shitty rhyming poem. Like we all learned to do as children. And it has a huge vocabulary to make rhymes with. But it was still uninspired drivel.

      For creative writing, it’s a tool. Not a writer. And for technical writing, well, it’s often wrong about things so… still a tool.