• TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m saying that your router and access point should be separate devices anyway, especially if you don’t want to replace said router.

    My router doesn’t have wireless at all. I have a dedicated WiFi 6 access point for that, if I want to go up to a newer standard I just replace the AP.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, fair enough. I’m kind of an intermediate user, because when I think of Access Point and Router, I think of the same device. But yet, I’m definitely a big advocate of open source software and hardware. But I do not self-host very much.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Less about open source, more of just a practical stance. The thing about networking is that standards change all the time, and it’s better to have a single device serve a single role on the network than to cram all those functions into a combo box.

        So an ideal network has a separate router, switch, and access point. Ideally two of each in redundant configurations but that’s not required for most people.