0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 11 months agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1198arrow-down10cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1198arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.com0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 11 months agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoBut where do you draw the line between “a human did it using a tool” and “it wasn’t created by a human?” Generative art exists, and can be copyrighted. Also a drawing made with Photoshop involves a lot of complex filters (some might even use AI!) I agree on the “fuck copyright” part that said.
But where do you draw the line between “a human did it using a tool” and “it wasn’t created by a human?”
Generative art exists, and can be copyrighted. Also a drawing made with Photoshop involves a lot of complex filters (some might even use AI!)
I agree on the “fuck copyright” part that said.