A 3M/Ipsos poll of more than 1,000 Australians published recently found 92% say that science can help us solve the problems of tomorrow and 88% see the connection between science and its role in improving their lives.

The Australian Academy of Science thanks the Australian public for their confidence and trust in science.

Perhaps the 88% of Australians surveyed who see positive benefits to their lives can imagine what life would be like without science and its application-a life without vaccines, no sanitation, no refrigeration, no smart phones, no comfortable dentistry, and no weather forecasting.

In a world in which everybody can be a sceptic but not everybody can be an expert, it is more important than ever that science is explained openly, in language that is accessible, and that the public can readily find sources of information that can be trusted-dispassionate, rational, expert.

This means fostering better public understanding of how science works and how it allows us to build knowledge over time.

Science is a system of knowledge: knowledge about the physical and natural world, knowledge gained through observation and experimentation, and knowledge organised systematically.

The public is aware: 93% of Australians surveyed believe positive outcomes can be achieved if people stand up for and defend science; 92% want business to take action to defend science.

  • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneMEnglish
    2·
    11 months ago

    I thought this was bs but just looked it up and there appear to be APCs (Article Processing Charges) upwards of $1000, however, closed access journals have comparable fees, I suppose these fees are to do with reviewing and formatting the paper

    • InsurgentRat@beehaw.orgEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      No the reviewing is done by other scientists for free. It’s potentially a bit webhosting etc but journals also take advertisements.

      The entire industry is a cruel joke.

      Most researchers are happy to email you a digital copy which they retain rights over if you ask though :)

      • spiffmeister@aussie.zone
        1·
        11 months ago

        Correct, scientists both do the labour of reviewing articles for free and then are also charged by the journals to view the articles.

        There are essentially only a few publishing companies so it’s basically a racket and they can do whatever they want. Most scientists in my field post preprint type articles on arXiv though so it can always be read there.