• delmain@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true for sure, but that doesn’t mean that it’s valve didn’t do an absolute fuckload of work to get proton to be actually functional.

      Getting direct3d and vulkan working with actually useful performance was the turning point for Wine being useful for games in addition to just standard applications.

      They definitely spent an ass-load of money on that and the fact that Wine was around for 25 years before that just goes to show that no one else was willing to do that.

      • ono@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Getting direct3d and vulkan working with actually useful performance

        They definitely spent an ass-load of money on that

        [citation needed]

        I’m not aware of Valve or Doitsujin ever revealing how much they paid him to make DXVK. I assume they paid him reasonably well, but I doubt it was an ass-load.

        the fact that Wine was around for 25 years before that just goes to show that no one else was willing to do that.

        Or maybe that Wine was a lot more work than the direct3d-to-vulkan shim that was done mainly by one person (now two people).

        Valve definitely helped by funding a few key projects, and packaging them in Steam made them convenient to use, but I think exaggerating their role unfairly diminishes the much larger body of work (done by other people) that makes it possible at all.

        Proton stands on the shoulders of giants.

        • prole@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of the development for Proton has also been community-based. Aside from whatever Steam has done to directly improve Proton, just creating the Steam Deck, and SteamOS has brought so much more attention and focus to improving it to an extent that probably wouldn’t have happened otherwise. It gave people a reason to volunteer their time to improve it.

      • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        direct3d Direct3D 11 and Direct3D12, to be precise. Direct3D9 was working fine before - and there even was native driver support for it in Mesa, that could be used together with a patched WINE.

  • DracEULA@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was able to ditch Windows completely thanks to them, haven’t had to dual boot for years. I remember back when I first tried linux there were only a handful of games that would run without hours of tinkering. Now compatibility is an afterthought; I just assume Steam games will work and I haven’t had any issues yet.

    • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Problem for me is def going to be modding games, have they fixed alt tabbing between games and desktop yet at least? It used to “crash” the game for me if I tabbed out even for a second.

      • thehellrocc@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never had this issue but it might be specific to the game you’re trying, using gamescope might help.

      • GiuEliNo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can try to use gamescope for that. Really useful for games that crash alt-tabbing

    • thehellrocc@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only (large enough) area which is currently lacking is multiplayer games, especially those with anticheats. Unfortunately, there’s nothing users can do about that other than wait for game developers to enable wine support, which, despite EAC and Battleye significantly simplifying the process, many still haven’t done.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huge kudos to them, they saw that they were on top of the PC market and wanted to expand, and they found the market of linux users who wanted to game on their machines too. Wine wasn’t up to par for gaming and they took it and ran with it. Beyond that they open sourced proton too, something most companies wouldn’t have done. Even if they quit now the help they gave to the linux community is immeasurable

    • nodiet@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Proton is based on wine, which is copyleft so valve didn’t exactly have a choice in keeping it open source. I also don’t necessarily think that their goal was to reach the rather small existing user base of Linux users, but rather they wanted to make sure they aren’t at the will of a bigger company (Microsoft) whose product is/was required to run most of what valve makes money with.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is probably more accurate, their entire model depended on Windows, and if they wanted to make their own devices they would all be forced to either start new or get Linux up and running. Motives aside they did good for the community

        • nodiet@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah their efforts are definitely a huge net benefit for the Linux community, I just don’t like seeing big companies portrayed in a better light than they deserve. When it comes down to it, what valve really cares about is still their bottom line.

    • knokelmaat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux users (me included) are only a few percents of all PC users. I don’t think they did it for us as a market, more to have an alternative to windows if they start closing down more (started with Windows 8 I believe). First try they fumbled a bit with the Steam Machines (Stream OS and proton weren’t there yet and the prices were not really competitive) and now nailed it with the Steam Deck. I do love that they seem to care about openness to some degree!

      • thehellrocc@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it’s probably more about them not being locked in MS’s ecosystem more than anything, but whatever the intention may be, everyone is benefiting from the results.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    A lot of the early porting work that came along was slowly dying off since the Steam Machines didn’t provide the boost Valve and Linux gamers were hoping for.

    Side-note: John Carmack (id Software / Oculus VR / Keen Technologies) even thought Wine was the solution back in 2013.

    Valve has funded a lot of extra work though to get things like DXVK and VKD3D-Proton for the translation from Direct3D to Vulkan into a state where performance can be really great!

    Games like Deep Rock Galactic, God of War, Death Stranding, Baldur’s Gate 3, Brotato, Beat Saber and so on.

    You get the idea, there’s a truly ridiculous selection of games available and at times it’s a little paralysing scrolling through my Steam Library deciding what to play — a delightfully annoying problem to have huh?

    Valve produce updates to Proton constantly to improve compatibility, with over 300 revisions to the main changelog (although some a minor text corrections) it’s clear to see how much work goes into it.


    Saved 85% of original text.