psychOdelic@discuss.tchncs.de to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 days agowhat's your most down voted comment?message-squaremessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up184arrow-down1message-squarewhat's your most down voted comment?psychOdelic@discuss.tchncs.de to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square170fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresteeznson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down3·1 day agoProbably one a few weeks ago where I said civilised people shouldn’t condone murder even if the victim is a bad person.
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·22 hours agoI still don’t feel bad about such people getting adjusted if it means a shift in perspective.
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·23 hours agoIt’s like the Trolley Problem, though. If the death of one person might cause fewer other people to die, could it be justified?
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours ago might You gamble with your own life too?
Probably one a few weeks ago where I said civilised people shouldn’t condone murder even if the victim is a bad person.
I still don’t feel bad about such people getting adjusted if it means a shift in perspective.
It’s like the Trolley Problem, though. If the death of one person might cause fewer other people to die, could it be justified?
You gamble with your own life too?