fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square88linkfedilinkarrow-up1358arrow-down12
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square88linkfedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
minus-squaremagnetosphere@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBy “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
No, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
By “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
It is not comparable.