• prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Read the whole thing. Couldn’t find any mention of LW. Mind to be more specific of where it is?

        • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          That paragraph:

          AI is a cruel technology. It replaces workers, devours millions of gallons of water, vomits CO2 into the atmosphere, propagandises exclusively for the worst ideologies, and fills the world with more ugliness and stupidity. Cruelty is the central tenet of right wing ideology. It is at the heart of everything they do. They are now quite willing to lose money or their lives in order to make the world a crueller place, and AI is a part of this – a mad rush to make a machine god that will liberate capital from labour for good. (This is no exaggeration: there is a lineage from OpenAI’s senior management back to the Lesswrong blog, originator of the concept of Roko’s Basilisk.) Moreso even than cryptocurrency, AI is entirely nihilistic, with zero redeeming qualities. It is a blight upon the world, and it will take decades to clear up the mountains of slop it has generated in the past two or three years.

          I don’t see them saying lemmy.world, or lemmy for that matter.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            33 minutes ago

            the other poster was snarking at the person who did not understand, as you also do not

            look for the word in there that features l and w. there’s only one (I checked)

            • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              I don’t see lemmy.world there, or lemmy for that matter.

              The words with l and w in ther that I do see are:

              • world

              • willing

              • will

              • Lesswrong

  • SuluBeddu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Let’s please try to be more specific

    “AI” in general is just overpowered statistics, which can be used in many very useful ways, including saving life and reducing the work needed to fulfill the needs of a population. AI can help plan maintenance to infrastructure, saving resources.

    The issue is the use of Generative AI that does no good public deeds, that is just a waste of resources, trained without consent on the data, to make investors happy.

    Which is more complex than just saying “AI”, the same way “Monopolistic social networks that exploit their user’s data for toxic advertisement” is more complex than just saying “computers” or “the internet”

    • rook@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      which can be used in many very useful ways, including saving life and reducing the work needed to fulfill the needs of a population

      Uh huh. “Can” needs an asterisk and some disclaimers there. And probably “useful”, too.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “Hello, peasants, I come to deliver you from ignorance. I can tell just by looking at your filthy clothes and vacant gazes that you all misuse the term AI. It is my obligation and privilege to educate you and inform you of the bright future AI is soon to bring, you swine.”

      That’s you

      • SuluBeddu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Look, I understand it can come off as pretentious. Perhaps it is

        But let’s frame this a second.

        AI, as I’m sure you are all aware, is a very old concept with useful applications dating back in the 80s. Not “the future is bright”, but “this is a useful tool that is already helping in many fields”.

        Then one day, in the last 5 years, monopolists start doing generative AI to offer a flashy useless and wasteful service.

        We then start calling this specific abuse of the technology, and of tens of years of passionate research, like the technology itself, overshadowing the rest.

        If you think there’s nothing wrong with that, I understand why my comment is unwanted. I think that it’s wrong, a generalisation we wouldn’t accept in other fields. I will refrain from making examples as I don’t want to sound even more pretentious.

        I guess I made my stand, I’ll refrain coming back to this post at this point.

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 hours ago

          wow what utter horseshit

          AI, as I’m sure you are all aware, is a very old concept with useful applications dating back in the 80s.

          the first AI winter happened because those fuckers couldn’t stop grifting academic funds by promising shit that didn’t work. we know the history of the field better than you do. not that you had a point other than wanting to reply guy about a name we didn’t adopt (cause we’re not OpenAI) for a technology all of us strongly dislike.

          fucking pointless shit

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 hours ago

            a very old concept with useful applications dating back in the 80s.

            wait a fucking minute

            you came here to lecture us and you think algorithms from the field of AI only started seeing serious use in the 80s? the Mark I Perceptron was built in 1958

            (I admittedly didn’t know about the machine before today, but I know more than enough about AI to know perceptrons as software are old as hell)

            • SuluBeddu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I mean we were talking about usefulness. In any case, Turing is always a good read, with early AI concepts from the 1950

              Which is, again, my point. AI is not just OpenAI and it’s a shame overshadowing the great minds behind it

              Sorry if I did reply again, I’m just glad you could agree useful AI exists

        • swlabr@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Pretentious? Try haughty.

          AI isn’t “just overpowered statistics”. What you said betrays your lack of understanding of both statistics and AI.

      • SuluBeddu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m sorry if it sounded OT, the title triggered my comment, and I think my point stands on that. With all respect to the contents of the article.

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      While all true, you’re missing the point of the article, which is why specifically the political right has embraced the aesthetic of “AI” generated slop. It’s a good deep read, well worth your time!