A decision to negotiate over the heads of the Ukrainians would reveal just how Trump sees Ukraine and Europe.
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
I said Russia shouldn’t attack their neighboring country but you thought it was ironic over something other than attacking their neighboring country. I don’t see the irony in that. I don’t think Russia or anyone should be attacking other countries.
So yes. You’re intentionally playing stupid. You have a problem with Russia invading the ukraine but you don’t have a problem with the ukraine invading the donbas and luhansk republics. And you’re pretending this is based on principle instead of just wanting your team (nazis) to commit ethnic cleansing on the other team (orcs).
Did you just call people in Donbas and Luhansk orcs…?
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
Keep a firm clutch on those pearls of yours, nazi. Their ethnic cleansing was fodder for your pithy troll replies but someone using your own verbage to mock you for your inhumanity and stop everything.
And when have I ever used that “verbage”?
I don’t have to comb through your hair to accuse you of having fleas after watching you lie with dogs
So you assumed I have said it and that’s why you decided to use such a term. Interesting.
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
It doesn’t seem absurd at all to ask where I’ve used such a term after you’ve claimed I’ve used it. For the record, I haven’t. And you can check, too.