• stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean that’s great and all, except these people that you’ve consigned to the dustbin of history are now going to actively fight against your causes.

    I think that some of them are too far gone but really this toxic environment needs to be fixed or else worse things will come from it. When you say “they should be ignored”, that’s part of the environment that causes these men to become the next shooter, or maybe just jump off a bridge because they have a conscience.

    Whether you like it or not, you need these people to make the right choices, and part of that starts by fostering a more inclusive environment.

    • Veraticus@lib.lgbtM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They were always actively fighting against any sensible cause though. Ignoring them won’t change that at all.

      Also we definitely don’t need these people. We won 2020 and 2022 without them.

      If our collectively ignoring them results in bad outcomes, that is their responsibility, not ours. They are fully-functioning adults and if they want to be taken seriously they must start acting like it. Because I (and I think most Americans) are done being threatened or cajoled by brittle men who think their opinions matter when, both practically and ideologically, they actually don’t.

      No more think pieces about why Americans in rural towns are being left behind. If they can’t figure out that they’re leaving themselves behind, at this point, that is entirely on them.

      • stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s a really disappointing viewpoint to have. These are people, and while a lot of the existing ones who have already fallen for the alt-right rhetoric may be too far gone, we should still take steps to make sure more young men don’t also fall into that trap. Which includes being more supportive and inclusive regarding men’s issues.

        • Veraticus@lib.lgbtM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Being a person does not necessarily make one worthy of being pandered to. If it did, why are they not dismissing all their political concerns to pander to mine? Why must I stop what I’m doing to cater to them instead of vice versa?

          No; this is halfway. Let them come if they want. If not, politics and progress will continue without them.

          • stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m sorry but is giving a shit about other people a political concern? Jesus Christ that’s a hot take. Good luck with that

              • stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I would but it’s mainly children we’re talking about preventing from going down the cis male -> alt-right pipeline here. Not random chucklefucks on Twitter