Russian President Vladimir Putin said Monday that a landmark deal allowing Ukraine to export grain safely through the Black Sea amid the war won’t be restored until the West meets Moscow’s demands on its own agricultural exports.

Ukraine and its Western allies have dismissed the Kremlin’s demands as a ploy to advance its own interests.

Still, Putin’s remarks dashed hopes that his talks with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan could revive an agreement seen as vital for global food supplies, especially in Africa, the Middle East and Asia.

  • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait. Do you actually think anyone in the west is going to invest in Russia after this war? They’ve seen first hand what these people are. No way they are going to start buying oil from them.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        While that’s true, the whole point of the conflict is over oil and the ultimate goal of the US in particular is to cut off Russia from their biggest buyers of oil. The sanctions will stay in place even after the war. Bet on it.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who said invest?.. He said buy their gas. No one’s going to make a substantial investment in Russia for decades now.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about substantial investments around Russia? Like investments in all the countries that surround Russia, investments in weapons?

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They absolutely will. The best way to keep people from using violence is engaging them in trade. It’s why sanctions do, eventually, work. If the world were to punitively continue not trading with Russia after they’ve withdrawn what incentive do they have to withdraw? And how long do you think it’d come to blows again, except this time on a more massive scale.

      Your attitude, if taken by anyone with any real authority, would be short sighted and dangerous.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are going to flock in and try to buy it out from under them. Again. Probably fail harder this time since it’s the same oligarchs in charge that benefitted last time.

      And then probably try to move heavy manufacturing in there for slave wages.

    • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends, Russia has nukes. Russia has a shakey economy right now. Civil war or a breakup of Russian territory is possible if it gets bad enough, and then it would be hard to predict who comes out with what armament.

      You need to help Russia get back on its feet as soon as possible, just like what happened with Japan and Germany after WWII.

      If we cut Russia off from everything forever, then we’re just gearing up for something worse, just like Germany after WWI.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We tried that, that’s what got us here.

        Maybe breaking it up is the best solution for everybody including russia?

        • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Eh, Russia really isn’t that big population wise. People get a warped opinion because of its size. A huge proportion of their population is in the southwest of the country nearer to Europe. The more north and east you go the more of a barren wasteland it is. Ukraine has 44M people Russia has 143M.

          Go look up like a population density map of Russia. It’s pretty crazy how much of the country is extremely low population density and undeveloped artic tundra type environment. I really don’t think it needs to be “broken up” considering over 2/3 of the country is basically unpopulated.

          • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why it needs to be broken up, the politics clearly don’t work and it’s not really fair for anyone.

            Imagine the caucuses with their own state, and southeast Siberia also, you could have functional, dynamic countries that actually grow and aren’t just targets of moscow propaganda and trade restrictions. They could export for currency to build their economies, instead of it all being channeled to the same few oligarchs.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        would be hard to predict who comes out with what armament.

        I’m picturing a civil war with the democratic countries backing one side and authoritarians backing the other, like now in Ukraine.