The prosecutors’ office in Madrid said that, according to a sexual consent law passed last year, Rubiales could face a fine or a prison sentence of one to four years if found guilty. The new law eliminated the difference between “sexual harassment” and “sexual assault,” sanctioning any unconsented sexual act.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does Spanish law apply if the act took place in Australia?

    Not that sexual assault is legal in Australia, either. Just curious why they’re talking about Spanish law - wouldn’t this come under Australian law?

    • tromars@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So I don’t know about Spanish criminal law in particular, but in Germany the criminal code states that it’s generally only applicable for acts committed on German territory, but there are multiple exemptions for offences committed abroad „with specific domestic connection“. This includes so called „offences against sexual self-determination“ if the offender is a German national. I could imagine that Spain has a similar rule.

      Update: Seems I was (mostly) right, but spanish law is even broader than that of germany in these cases.

      The Spanish courts shall also have jurisdiction over acts recognized as offences under Spanish criminal law, even if they have been committed outside the national territory, provided that the perpetrators are Spanish nationals or foreigners who have acquired Spanish nationality after the commission of the crime, and subject to the following conditions: (a) The act is an offence in the place where it was committed; (b) The victim or the Public Prosecution Service has filed a complaint or brought a case before the Spanish courts; (c) The alleged perpetrator has not been acquitted, pardoned or convicted abroad, or, in the latter case, has not served his or her sentence. If he or she has served part of the sentence, this will be taken into account in order to reduce proportionally the sentence imposed.

      https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/71/universal_jurisdiction/spain_e.pdf

    • You@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If it’s illegal in Australia and Australia decides to prosecute, then you use Australian law in front of an Australian Court.

      Here the harmed party and the alleged offender are both Spanish citizens. If there’s a Spanish law and ‘Spain’ decides to prosecute, they’ll use Spanish law in front of a Spanish Court. A Spanish Criminal Court can’t sentence someone on the basis of Australian Criminal law.

    • agrammatic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not sure if relevant, but in recent years, several countries have proclaimed universal jurisdiction for certain crimes. Increasingly often, countries assert the right to prosecute their own citizens for abuse of children even when committed abroad, which has been deemed necessary to counter “sex tourism”.

      Given that this is an accusation of sexual assault, I won’t be surprised if Spain claims jurisdiction for sexual abuse of/by its citizens anywhere in the world.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    MADRID (AP) — Spanish soccer player Jenni Hermoso has accused Luis Rubiales of sexual assault for kissing her on the lips without her consent after the Women’s World Cup final, the country’s prosecutors’ office said Wednesday.

    Rubiales, the now-suspended president of the Spanish soccer federation, kissed Hermoso on the lips during the awards ceremony after Spain beat England to win the title on Aug. 20 in Sydney, Australia.

    She also said she and her family were pressured by the federation to show her support for Rubiales in the immediate aftermath of the scandal caused by the kiss that tarnished her team’s victory.

    A government legal panel overseeing sports has opened a probe to determine if he abused his authority by kissing Hermoso or tainted the image of Spain with his conduct.

    “I felt vulnerable and a victim of an impulse-driven, sexist, out of place act without any consent on my part,” Hermoso said in a statement posted on social media.

    After Rubiales refused to step down last week and accused Hermoso of lying, the entire team of World Cup winners plus dozens more players said they would not play again for Spain until the president was gone.


    The original article contains 728 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!