Virgin “Chicken Jockey is funny because vidya reference” vs Chad “Chicken Jockey is funny because it’s symbolic of man’s desire for shared social experiences in cinema, an escape from the atomized experience of streaming. Chicken Jockey is not euphoric because of any inherent value, but rather the value in the collective screaming of ‘Chicken Jockey!’ with one’s comrades in the group setting, the reaffirmation of social bonds.”
Virgin “Chicken Jockey is funny because vidya reference” vs Chad “Chicken Jockey is funny because it’s symbolic of man’s desire for shared social experiences in cinema, an escape from the atomized experience of streaming. Chicken Jockey is not euphoric because of any inherent value, but rather the value in the collective screaming of ‘Chicken Jockey!’ with one’s comrades in the group setting, the reaffirmation of social bonds.”
I mean one is a shallow reflection of media consumption, and the other actually reflects why people participate in seemingly absurd behaviors.
vs giga chad “chicken jockey is funny because vidya reference”