• theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.

      Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.

      Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?

      • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

        Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?

        • twistypencil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You two stop. You are acting like people who misunderstand each other because of words, but are flinging around attacks because the medium is restricting your ability to have a constructive discussion. Now kiss and make up

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

          Lol this is nonsense.

          First off, executives are literally workers. You claim to have an MBA in your post history yet you understand nothing about how businesses actually work

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Classes aren’t real. You can tell because they mean whatever you want them to mean.

              If I am doing a job for pay, I am a worker.

              • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Every time you open your mouth, you say something even stupider than the last. Keep sucking corporate dick.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Reality is going to be super weird for you when your actually do graduate. Stop pretending on the internet. It’s a weird look, and you never know who actually might have the experience you pretend to have

                  • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    LMAO ok dude, I’m sure your vast experience eating ass at your tiny 200 person company to make your way up to manager qualifies you to make asinine comments like “herp derp look at their balance sheet to see how much they can increase pay”, but you literally know less than nothing.