compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 天前Meta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up1793arrow-down119cross-posted to: BoycottUnitedStates@europe.pubnottheonion@lemmy.worldlgbtq_plus@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmit.onlinenews@hexbear.net
arrow-up1774arrow-down1external-linkMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comcompostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 天前message-square153linkfedilinkcross-posted to: BoycottUnitedStates@europe.pubnottheonion@lemmy.worldlgbtq_plus@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmit.onlinenews@hexbear.net
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·29 天前OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·29 天前Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
minus-squareOrteilGenou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-228 天前We’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·29 天前If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·29 天前That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo
Not even a little.
OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
That too.
We’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo