• Chriskmee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So basically what you are saying is the more successful a business is, the more of it we should steal away from the rightful owners?

      • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does that social contact say, that you must give you everything if you are too successful?

        And yes, I have never heard of Ayn Rand, no idea who they are or what they do. I only know now that she is a writer who died before I was born because I just googled it.

          • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are welcome to prove me wrong instead of making baseless accusations. I’m sorry the truth doesn’t fit into your narrative.

    • kugel7c@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes the ones that draw the largest benefit from a society should contribute the largest amount back. If there is infinite growth for some and infinite servitude for others the social contract is breaking, in this way it’s much more reasonable to actually use taxation instead of just standing by while the society that all this wealth was extracted from takes violent revenge to their oppressors.

      Without the rest of us billionaires couldn’t exist to begin with, so if their wealth starts breaking our governments, our communities, our collective self determination, which they currently are doing, we naturally should remind them that they are nothing without the rest of us. And yeah the taxhammer is likely the more appropriate tool than the guillotine or the Molotov cocktail.

      Their wealth presupposes a largely peaceful society, why should we let them break it. This is for example why GG Art 14 has

      (1) Property and the right of inheritance shall be guaranteed. Their content and limits shall be defined by the laws. (2) Property entails obligations. Its use shall also serve the public good.

      written back to back in the same paragraph, the obvious implication being uses of property that go against the public good may be curtailed by the law.