• stonedemoman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, this ban accomplishes absolutely nothing except producing more expensive alternatives that do the exact same thing.

      I’m glad you survived your battle, but this ban would only serve to disproportionately affect the poor.

      • Dandroid@dandroid.app
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just wish it was banned in public because I choose to not put poison in my body, yet I have to inhale everyone else’s poison that they are ingesting near me. In public and in cars is where I wish it was banned. There’s nothing worse than being stuck behind someone in traffic that is smoking and you have nowhere to go and nothing to do except inhale that shit.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I got bad news for you… cigarette smoke is the least of your worries when stuck in traffic. You’re inhaling exhauste fumes from every car near you…

          • deur@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh man if only there were laws in place to attempt to help mitigate that risk… placing the responsibility on the car owners to ensure their cars meet emissions regulations to reduce the impact upon third parties.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have to say, pot is getting like that too. While I support that it’s now decriminalized (where I live), now it’s becoming a nuisance. I shouldn’t have to breathe second hand smoke regardless of what you’re smoking

      • aelwero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also my opinion, and the outcome of prohibition would suggest that society at large generally believes this as well.

        …with an obvious exception for minorities…

        Which was my point. Apparently the politics of it, and decades of anti tobacco propaganda (and I dont intend the normally negative connotation the word has, it just is what it is) have made this acceptable somehow… for an obviously racial/homophobic exception to just be openly declared and apparently acceptable… it’s kinda weird to me.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No you don’t lmao the FDA is kind of the authority here. There’s nothing on store shelves that you can choose or not choose to put in your body that wasn’t already cleared by the FDA. You have an illusion of choice.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Menthol cigarettes just make it easier to get cancer than plain ones.

      Were you a smoker, and did you ever smoke menthols? Menthols give a bit different feeling, but I wouldn’t say it’s that much “easier” to smoke.

      The EU did the same thing to ban menthols a couple years ago, and yet I can still go to the store and buy cigarettes with menthol taste. These new fake-menthols surprisingly feel even smoother to smoke than classic menthols, but it’s still not a big difference compared to unflavored cigarettes IMO.

      • TauZero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Menthol makes it easier to start smoking, to continue being a smoker for longer than the person would have done otherwise, and to smoke more, because it makes smoking less irritating and tastes better. You are correct in that the menthol molecule itself is not a carcinogen.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you have a source for these claims? No one is smoking cigarettes for the taste, nor is “bad taste” a common reason for anyone to quit. Smoking is both a chemical addiction (nicotine and such) and a psychological habit (place and timing, having something in the mouth, forced breathing exercises, etc).

          If we really wanted to hinder big tobacco, they’d start requiring producers to document all their ingredients, additives, and processing methods.

          • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. It’s all about money & control and it always has been. If they wanted to get people to stop smoking, they’d mandate that the tobacco companies remove all of the chemicals from cigarettes that make the nicotine a free base form to increase their addictive properties.

              • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nic Salts are the free base equivalent of cigarettes for the vaping world, but I agree that it’s a lot less harmful. The government would endorse vaping if they truly wanted to end smoking, since it has an incredibly high success rate as a smoking cessation device, like orders of magnitude higher than any other form. All of the other cessation methods (which are owned by the tobacco companies BTW), have a max success rate of about 3.5%. Vaping has a success rate of almost 70%! So yeah, their opposition to vaping makes my point even more clear.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it doesn’t. It’s purely a preference. There are tons of smokers who can’t stand menthols but love regular cigarettes. I even know someone who smokes menthols because he said it makes people less likely to bum cigarettes off of him.

          • Eatsuki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I even know someone who smokes menthols because he said it makes people less likely to bum cigarettes off of him.

            That’s why I switched to menthols back when I smoked. That, and I just liked them more. I didn’t like the ultra menthol ones like Kools or Benson & Hedges, but Marlboro Milds were just about perfect, and the amount of “Oh…those are menthol? Nevermind” was the cherry on top.