• Vode An@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Going after the marketplace is a more efficient strategy than playing whack a mole with individual sellers.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also being a marketplace they do have a duty to make sure that people are not selling illegal items on their platform.

      Because if platforms didn’t could you imagine how bad the Internet would be for buying things.

      • Vode An@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t disagree. I am generally in favor of keeping markets on a short leash. As you said, it could be a lot worse.

    • Damage
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The correct way would be to go after the buyers

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As would the RIAA’s war on piracy. Despite the exhorbitant fines being handed down, I don’t believe they’ve made any profit from them.

      • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a political bomb though. This accomplishes the same end goal and is a strong enough warning to prevent similar markets popping up in the future

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well they are illegal, although enforcement is up to the local jurisdiction. If you try to install these in California for instance, you will have a bad day and they can and will impound your vehicle.