The big drawback to refreshable braille devices has always been their cost. The loose rule of estimation applied to these products has translated into someth…

  • bluGill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If it lasts me a year, that is two days for a blind person. In just a few months the 3k.version is cheaper for them. I don’t think quality will improve in a few months, more likely they go bankrupt from warranty claims (if open source develop a bad reputation and nobody uses it)

    • prorester@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      you = generic you, not “bluGill”. But even so, do you seriously think these components will last you 2 days? That’s just an argument in bad faith.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You said that it was last me one year. Since I’m not blind, only someone vaguely interested that would be two days - not for me, but for someone who is blind and thus needs to use this all day.

        As for how long it will last? That is an open question. It has small moving plastic parts Making those last is a difficult engineering challenge, so while 2 days (for the blind) wouldn’t surprise me, I’m not actually stating anything. Fortunately it is easy for them to test: build one, figure out how fast blind people read, and then throw project Gutenberg at it repeatedly for a while to see how long it lasts. Since it is so easy I’ll just stick with how long it lasts is a real worry, but I expect someone to do some tests and tell everyone. Ideally it would be the creators as they can do a failure analysis and maybe fix problems.

        If it lasts a blind person a year this is a good win.