• meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my experience the people that “involve” themselves are raging clowns with superiority complexes.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they have control because they don’t have opposition from people who aren’t like them… Welcome to politics, it’s the same thing at all levels. Get involved or shut up. You don’t vote? Then you agree with whatever the people who do decided.

      • explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Or just don’t agree, and get a house that’s not part of an HOA. With individual houses at least, you can realistically opt out of a system where the 51% of Karens accept management company bribes.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You didn’t understand what they said… You’re free to purchase a house somewhere where there’s no HOA if you disagree with HOAs and don’t want to get involved in them. That’s how you have the freedom to opt out.

            • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the US these homes are increasingly rare. Pretty much any neighborhood built since the 70s comes with HOA bullshit attached

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                74% of the housing market doesn’t have an HOA in the USA, worst case put pressure on the higher level of government to get them regulated, it’s a US issue, you don’t see that anywhere else.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I understand their point, it’s just a bad one. So much of where we live depends on job, educational, financial, and familial circumstances that it’s just outright ludicrous to pretend HOAs are the only factor to consider for a home purchase. Or even an important one.

              Especially when so much of what makes them frustrating to deal with is created by bad HOA members, not even necessarily the contract itself. You will not know it’s a problem until it becomes one, in all likelihood.

              Yes, you are technically free to not buy into a HOA neighborhood, like you’re also free to deliberately send your kid to a shitty school as you live in a van.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Three quarters of US citizens live somewhere without an HOA, doesn’t seem so hard not to have to deal with one and if you do, as I already mentioned, just get involved and improve things and if that doesn’t fix it then get involved at a higher level. HOAs are a US issue only, get them regulated.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you believe the working class is america is under represented because less working class members vote than the rich voters? “Welcome to politics, it’s the same thing at all levels” That just isn’t how it works is it?

        Home owners associations are more accessible to those with more money and more time. Seems familiar doesn’t it.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I believe that if there’s only 20 owners that are involved and you jump in you’re 1 out of 21 voices instead of 1 out of millions of voices so your opinion has more weight to it.

        • Serinus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people.

          Also the rich people help run ads telling the working class who to vote for. And that works often enough to be effective.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Well, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people.”

            So your answer was no.

            So now lets get into the President. Vice President, Treasurer, Member at Large, and Secretary postions.

            They have the ability (as the board) to vote on a matter without the “populous” being present or having a vote.

            An HOA can be okay, but can take advantage of situations really quickly. Not to mention hold grudges over things for years.